DEYAN RANKO BRASHICH was born in Belgrade, former Yugoslavia, and is an Op-Ed columnist for Connecticut's Litchfield County Times.  He writes the monthly Letter From America column for Romania’s Scrisul Romanesc, a literary magazine and is the Editor-at-Large for  The Country and Abroad, another literary/art magazine where he authors the Dispatch from Abroad column. He is a frequent contributor to Pecat, the Belgrade, Serbia weekly news magazine, Britić, a magazine published in the United Kingdom, Ekurd Daily, a multinational Kurdish news portal and Passport, a lifestyle quarterly. He resides in New York City and Washington, Connecticut.






In 1957 Milovan Djilas, the Yugoslav dissident called the victorious post war communist elite the “new ruling class” and predicted that Communism’s eventual demise would be caused by it and its excesses. For that he was muzzled, silenced and jailed. In 1989 while predicting the disintegration and destruction of Yugoslavia he declared that economic “centralization will not succeed because it will run up against the ethnic-political power bases in the republics. This is not classical nationalism but a more dangerous, bureaucratic nationalism built on economic self-interest.”

Change Milovan Djilas’ “centralization” to “globalization”, “ethnic power” to “racist xenophobia” and you have our current state of affairs and predicament. The collapse that he predicted for socialist Yugoslavia came to pass in a bloody mess. Today the United States and the European Union, once democratic republics, are besieged by a far left and ultra-right coalition and in danger of becoming dictatorships.   

His prescient world view holds true. Yugoslavia in the 1940’s and 50’s experienced a transformation from an agricultural economy to a manufacturing one without regard to social and economic consequences and long term costs. The United States and the European Union have recently experienced a like change. The two have gone from labor intense manufacturing economies to a service and technology oriented ones with a major loss of jobs and job security. The result has been the elimination of the middle class with the control of power, political and economic, vested in corporate vested interests and the rich one percent.    

Djilas’ second catch word was “nationalism”. Nationalism for Yugoslavia was a word that had many definitions: it spoke to ethnicity as in Serbs, Croats and Slovenes; it spoke to racism as in Slavs, Albanians and Gypsies; it spoke to religious intolerance as in Catholic, Orthodox and Muslim; it spoke to culture and politics - the West for the Croats, Russia for the Serbs and Medina for the Muslims. It was nationalism writ small, no better than base tribalism.

The United States, the land of immigrants, has nationalism geographically defined by a 2,000-mile wall on its southern border, Presidential Executive Orders declaring Muslims persona non-grata and Mexicans rapists and criminals. Racism was front and center in the 2016 United States Presidential election with David Duke of the Ku Klux Klan running for office and African-Americans hectored to vote lest “a racist is going to be president” responding with a “Really? Again?”

Click to read more ...



Guy Wildenstein at the Courthouse Paris [Eric Feferberg/APF/Getty Images]

“The rich are” - you don’t have to add Scott Fitzgerald’s words to make the point. Laws and rules are different for the likes of them when it comes to crime. Last July, I wrote about crime in the genteel, well-mannered world of art - forgery, money laundering, tax evasion and the like [“Art Crime Death and Taxes”]. Million dollar felonies by millionaires became mere accounting errors punished by the filing of amended tax returns and the payment of taxes due, without interest or penalties. Nice work if you can get it.

The lead case then pending was France’s $600 million tax evasion prosecution of Guy Wildenstein, his family, their bankers and retainers which had been ongoing since 2013. A blanket of silence had obscured the proceedings since that January and “[m]y inquiries about the resolution of the l’Affaire Wildenstein were met with stone silence.”

I believed and wrote that the prosecution would end with a whimper; the French authorities would apply liberté, égalité, fraternité, leavened with an ample dose of “the rich are”, and drop the charges. After all, Guy Wildenstein is one of the elite, a friend of President Sarkozy, a member of the Assembly of French Citizens Abroad, a Chevalier of the Légion D’honeur, a wealthy man, not a man likely to do time.

Last October I was gobsmacked to read that the prosecutor was asking France’s High Court for Financial Crimes to find Guy Wildenstein guilty of tax evasion and money laundering, sentencing him to four years in prison – with two years suspended – and fining him $275 million dollars.

I thought, finally France has declared open season on tax evasion by the rich and famous, justice will prevail. I started drafting a new conclusion to my article. Not so fast.

Last Thursday the French court applying a reverse variation of noblesse oblige acquitted M. Wildenstein and company of all criminal charges. Olivier Géron, the Presiding Judge read the court’s decision acquitting Guy, his family and retainers even though he found the judgment “defies common sense” and was contrary to the “clear intention [of the defendants] to conceal their wealth across generations”.

In other words, they are guilty as sin, they meant to do the crime but won’t have to do the time, proving once again that the rich are.   






Rx to prevent cyberwars:  Declare cyberattacks war crimes and all state sponsored cyberattack participants personally liable.

The world is dependent on computers and the internet. This has changed the way we think, work and interact including the way nations make war and maintain peace. The term “cyberwars” has entered our lexicon. New norms of behavior have to be agreed upon and new criminal statutes enacted to respond to this change, including a new definition of “war crimes” for the digital world.     

A war crime is a disregard for human life, a serious violation of the law of war [a true non-sequitur] which, in the context of cyberwarfare, includes the intentional killing of civilians, destruction of civilian property, the use of weapons causing superfluous injury and unnecessary suffering, causing great suffering or serious injury to body and health which, most importantly, gives rises to individual criminal responsibility.

Cyberwars are no longer hypothetical war games, they are real. In 2006 a joint US Israel program used computer cyber-weapons to attack, disable and delay Iran’s nuclear program. That year Aramco, Saudi Arabia’s national oil company was attacked and 30,000 computers were compromised and rendered inoperative; in the United States a denial of service attack froze the operations of major financial institutions; between 2010 and 2014 the US Department of Energy computer systems were “successfully compromised … more than 150 times”; in 2007 “the government of Estonia was subjected to cyber terrorism … by the Nashi, a pro-Kremlin group from Transnistria.”

In October, 2013 the Secretary of Defense warned that the United States was facing a “cyber-Pearl Harbor” that could destroy our communications systems, power grids, financial networks, military defense networks, basically the whole shebang by compromising our computers using cyber weapons and the internet. “An aggressor nation or extremist group could use these … cyber tools to gain control of …” critical assets, wreak havoc and “let loose the dogs of war”.

That December The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal reported that their websites, editors and reporters had been hacked by the Chinese government, its agencies or by individuals under their control “seeking to control the free flow of information”.

Also in 2013 Germany, our NATO ally, formally announced the establishment of a 130 hacker-strong “Computer Network Operations Unit”, part of the BDN, the intelligence agency, which would act as a cyber defense unit and have “enhanced capabilities” presumably offensive in nature.

In retrospect, the era of the “drone war” was short and geographically limited to low tech regional conflicts, Somalia, the South Sudan, Eritrea, Ethiopia. There are new weapons to deploy. The New York Times reported [“Broad Powers Seen for Obama in Cyberstrikes”, February 4, 2013] that “a secret legal review on the use of America’s growing arsenal of cyber-weapons has concluded that President Obama has the broad power to order a pre-emptive strike”, a marked escalation from the severely limited capabilities of a drone attack now that we have abandoned the folly of inter-continental ballistic missiles.  

Not all cyber actions are designed to destroy; some are limited to propaganda, mischief and misinformation. The 2016 presidential election has demonstrated the ability of a foreign power to influence and manipulate the course of domestic events. No one was killed, no property was destroyed but nevertheless this was an attack on the sovereignty of a nation state. Yet even when designed not to bring about physical harm a cyber-attack can inadvertently cause disaster. “Olympic Games” the joint US Israeli effort to thwart Iran’s nuclear program used a cyber weapon, a “worm”. The “worm” went rogue and went on a rampage infecting computers worldwide. Had the rogue worm sabotaged a nuclear device Teheran would have been a new Hiroshima.      

Governments have adopted a “if you fuck with us and our computers, we will fuck with you and yours” attitude. Once a cyber incursion has been detected, such as the hacking of the Democratic National Committee emails or the Grizzly Steppe Russian malware detected on Vermont’s Burlington Electric’s electric grid, traditional diplomatic sanctions are brought into play – in exchange of volleys, diplomats are expelled, economic restrictions imposed, a tit for tat response that gets the guilty participants off the hook.

Click to read more ...



Yogi Berra and President George W Bush 2001 – Photo courtesy Paul MorseDonald Trump, once a joke of a candidate but now the President Elect, brings to mind the astute malapropism of the political sage Lawrence “Yogi” Berra [1925-2015] who, if still alive, might have included the highlighted comments in his tweets during the campaign.

In the Republican debates Donald Trump told his opponents to “shut up and talk” because “it was hard to have a conversation with anyone – there were too many people talking”. In any event, Trump “really didn’t say everything [he] said”. After each debate he declared that the candidates had a “good time together, even when we were not together”.

The other candidates [Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz et al] “can run anytime [they] want [for President] I am giving [them] the red light”. As for Ted Cruz, remember that “anyone who is popular is bound to be disliked” and “Texas has a lot of electrical votes”.  

At each debate and campaign rally Trump promised to “make America great again” because the “future ain’t what it used to be” and “if the world were perfect, it wouldn’t be.” 

In the national debates he accused Clinton of having “made too many wrong mistakes”. He cautioned that “If you don’t know where you’re going, chances are you will end up somewhere else” and that “You’ve got to be very careful if you don’t know where you are going, because you might not get there”. As for himself he assured voters that when hecomes to a fork in road … [he will] take it”.

His policies were broad and undefined for “if you don’t set goals, you can’t regret not reaching them” and as for his lack of experience “you can observe a lot by just by watching”. He refused to campaign in California because “nobody goes there anymore, it’s too crowded” and while It’s not too far, it just seems like it is”. 

After all was said and done Donald Trump was elected President and we are in a transition mode with cabinet and presidential appointments making headlines, “we’re lost, but we’re making great time”. It will be “It’s deja-vu all over again” for “it ain’t over ‘til it’s over”. Updates will be posted periodically.   

Written with homage, thanks and gratitude to one of the great masters of English Letters, the incomparable Yogi Berra. The words in quotations and in bold are Yogi’s, not mine. 



South Korean Special Police anti-terrorist exercise 2014 Seoul, South Korea subway station – Photo Lee Jin-man, Courtesy Associated Press


No matter where you go today false illusions of security are in your face. In New York’s Grand Central Station, Paris’ Gare du Nord and Berlin’s Hauptbahnhof you are confronted with the black helmeted and Kevlar cossetted uniforms of the police and security services. The uniforms are complemented by assault rifles, automatic weapons and other bellicose gear. Occasionally they are enhanced by eager German shepherds straining at their leash. This is supposed to make you feel safe. Far from it, this instills fear in my heart.

This modern phenomenon has been replicated world-wide and to quote Cole Porter: “Birds do it. Bees do it. Even educated fleas do it.” And so, South Korea, Japan, Israel, Spain and even tiny Montenegro, population 650,000, all boast special anti-terrorist police units and forces. Their appearance with all their gear and weapons is awe inspiring and for me, frightening.

 Keeping order in peace time is no longer the job for the local police - the police precinct down the street, the Irish cop on the beat. That role has been usurped by special elite units that are not answerable to the usual chain of civilian command authority, the governor, the mayor, the city council or the city manager. These forces while under the nominal control of local authorities, are controlled by the national government’s military security apparatus.       

Ever since September 11, 2001 and more recently since the Nice terror attack and the Paris killings at the Stade de France and the Bataclan Theatre government security forces worldwide have become more visible, more assertive, more militarized. In the United States, they have been deployed for 15 years against terrorist forces that never seem to materialize. Internationally they have been used to justify the never-ending wars in the Middle East and the Horn of Africa, while accomplishing little if anything at home.

In the United States since 1997 with the “1033 Program” the Department of Defense has transferred $5.1 billion dollars of military equipment to civilian law enforcement agencies. Last year the Department of Homeland Security supported local law enforcement with $1 billion dollars while the Department of Defense made an additional $449 million contribution.

Likewise, the European Union military and the defense departments are funding and equipping their special forces in response to the Council of Europe’s Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism and the Additional Protocol of 2015. These measures are not funded by the cities of Paris, Rome or Podgorica, they are funded by national treasuries.

The present expenditure of money and resources reminds me of the Cold War and Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative, the multi-billion-dollar Star Wars farce. The fear of the Soviet Union propelled the United States into a binge of defense related projects that far exceeded the actual threat that they were supposed avert. We had the Strategic Air Command, the Major Air Command and hundreds of other acronym designated entities doing all “kinds of mean, nasty, ugly things” at great expense while the Russians were doing their best to do the same.

Click to read more ...

Page 1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... 45 Next 5 Entries »